20-01 Injured Player Replacement improvements (Reg 7.14)

PROPOSAL Make some minor improvements. Extend replaced player suspension to 2 playing days rather than 20 calendar days.

REASON New rule season 2019/20. Fix some version 1 'bugs'.The wording of the suspension clause does not deal with holidays such as Xmas/New Year.

CURRENT REGULATIONS Sat Reg 7.14 (also 7.12, 7.13)




This new regulation was introduced in 2019/20 season and was used on 13 occasions in about 200 two day matches in the past season.

Feedback received indicated that the concession was well received by those teams that were allowed to use it. Of similar use was Reg 7.13 which allows replacements of players due to Premier (Grade) cricket (used on several occasions) and Reg 7.12 which allows for replacements due to Rep cricket duty (no occasions of use in 2019/20).

Improvements that were suggested in feedback were:
  • a clearer procedure
  • in particular, 7.14.3.1 should say "ADDED" instead of "NAMED" in the Team List
  • Change the clearance period to 3 playing days (or equivalent) rather than 20 calendar days (the wording of this needs to careful to exclude Xmas and New Year)
  • This means the replaced player is out for the next two day match in all ways that might happen.(to include the Xmas/New Year delay or rained off days)
  • emphasis of the need for Secretary approval
Similar improvements to this procedure could be added to 7.12 and 7.13

After a few more revisions this is a new version of theses regulations which combines all 3 replacement reasons. The new regulation number is 23.2


  
EXISTING PLAYING REGULATION PROPOSED NEW PLAYING REGULATION


7.14 REPLACEMENTS OF PLAYERS RESULTING FROM SERIOUS INJURY OR ILLNESS 23.2    REPLACEMENTS PLAYERS RESULTING FROM UNEXPECTED CIRCUMSTANCES
        Applies to Saturday Two Dayers only

Preamble: It is expected that in any situation where representative commitments are likely but unannounced that replacements will be arranged under Playing Regulations 23.1 rather than rely on this Playing Regulation 23.2
7.14.1 This regulation applies in addition to and not in substitution for Regulations 7.11, 7.12, 7.13. 23.2.1    This regulation applies in addition to and not in substitution for Playing Regulation 23.1
7.14.2 If a player named on the team list becomes unavailable during the match because of unexpected serious injury or illness that player may be replaced subject to the following regulations. 23.2.2    If a player named on the team list becomes unavailable during the match because of: an unexpected representative cricket duty, or an unexpected Premier Cricket duty, or an unexpected serious injury or illness   then that player may be replaced subject to the following regulations.
7.14.2.1 This regulation applies to all Association Rounds but does not apply in Semi Final and Grand Final matches. 23.2.2.1    Note: The serious injury or illness replacement does not apply in Semi Final and Grand Final matches.


QUALIFICATION CONDITIONS FOR REPLACEMENT PLAYER QUALIFICATION CONDITIONS FOR REPLACEMENT PLAYER
7.14.3 The replacement player must be: 23.2.3    The replacement player must:

23.2.3.1    be Registered and cleared in MyCricket. (See Playing Regulations 3 and 5)
7.14.3.1 Named in the Team List 23.2.3.2    have their name added to the Team List
7.14.3.2 Subject to the conditions in 7.11.5, 7.11.6, 7.11.7 23.2.3.3    be subject to the conditions in Playing Regulations 23.1.5, 23.1.6, 23.1.7
7.14.3.3 Graded the same or lower grade. See Regulation 4.6.2. 23.2.3.4    be graded the same or lower grade. See Playing Regulation 4.6.2
7.14.3.4 Nominated as a substitute fielder only if they do not meet any of these criteria. See Law 24 (2017 Code) 23.2.3.5    Any player may act as a substitute fielder only (no batting, no bowling) if not qualified. See Law 24.1 (2017 Code)

23.2.3.6    Substitute fielders require only the approval of the match umpire. (See Law 24.1 2017 Code)


PROCEDURE FOR REPLACEMENT OF PLAYERS WITH SERIOUS INJURY STEPS FOR THE CLUB SECRETARY (OR DEPUTY) OF A PLAYER TO BE REPLACED
7.14.4 The Replacement Player's Club Secretary will make a written request detailing the circumstances of the player's injury. Note that a verbal request is not sufficient. 23.2.4    The Club Secretary of the player to be replaced will make a written request to the Association Secretary.


23.2.4.1    The deadline for replacement requests is 10am Saturday prior to start of play day 2.

23.2.4.2    Note that a verbal request is not sufficient.
7.14.5 Nil 23.2.5    The request will include the include the following information about the replacement.

23.2.5.1    Name and MyCricket ID of the player to be replaced.

23.2.5.2    Description of the player’s injury or illness, or  description of the player’s Premier Cricket duties, or description of the player’s representative cricket duties.

23.2.5.3    In any case of illness or injury that the illness or injury first occurred after the start of the match.

23.2.5.4    Current Match grade, Current Match venue, Current Match opposition, Current Match Umpire’s name.

23.2.5.5    Name and contact phone number of the player’s team captain.

23.2.5.6    Opposition team captain's name.

23.2.5.7    The name and MyCricket ID of the replacement player.

23.2.5.8    Note that all information is required for approval of the replacement.

23.2.5.9    Note that a medical certificate is not required.

23.2.6    After the match is complete the Replacement Player's Club Secretary will send a copy of the match scorebook or Team List showing the injured player and replacement to the Association Secretary.




STEPS FOR THE ASSOCIATION SECRETARY (OR DEPUTY)

23.2.7    In response to a valid request the Association Secretary will issue a written approval to be sent to the replaced player's club secretary.

23.2.8    The Association Secretary will also notify the opposition team club secretary, the match umpire, the opposition team captain.



INJURED PLAYER SUSPENSION
7.14.9 The injured player to be replaced is to be placed on a twenty day inactive list and will not play in any Association match until this time period has expired. 23.2.9    In any case of illness or injury, the player to be replaced is to be placed added to an inactive list for a time period covering the next three weekends of scheduled competition rounds.

23.2.9.1    Note that this means weekends without scheduled competition rounds (e.g Christmas and New Year) will not be counted as part of the three weekends but rained out weekends will be counted as part of the three weekends.

23.2.9.2    No suspension applies to replacement players due to representative duty or Premier Cricket duty.

23.2.10    Any player on the inactive list will not play in any Association match until the inactive time period has expired.

23.2.11    The Association Secretary (or Deputy) will seek post-match confirmation from club secretary of injured player to check inactive player suspension.


ALLOWANCES ALLOWANCES
7.14.14 Consequential vacancies in lower grade teams must be filled in accordance with Regulation 7.14.3 23.2.12    Consequential vacancies in lower grade teams must be filled in accordance with Playing Regulation 23.2.3
7.14.6 23.2.13    If any player selected for Replacement becomes injured and so is unable to play on a subsequent day of play, a different player may be nominated as a replacement subject to the deadline in Playing Regulation 23.2.4.1
7.14.15 Regarding eligibility for finals, any replaced or replacement player will be counted as appearing in the whole match in the grade in which that player commenced the match. 23.2.15    Regarding eligibility for finals, any replaced or replacement player will be counted as appearing in the whole match in the grade in which that player commenced the match.
7.12.16 23.2.16    For the purposes of this regulation, “representative duties” will mean :
7.14.16.1 State duties (all ages) in either the first or second eleven or duties higher than state duties.

7.13.16

23.2.17    For the purposes of this regulation, Premier Cricket duties will mean :
7.13.16.2 23.2.17.1    Premier Cricket duties where the player is a member of a club with other teams in Premier Cricket
7.13.16.3 23.2.17.2    Premier Cricket duties where the player is a member of a Premier Cricket club playing with a club with a written player exchange agreement with a club in Premier Cricket.


REPLACEMENTS CAUTION REPLACEMENTS CAUTION

23.2.18    The replacement may only proceed when written approval from the Association Secretary has been received.
7.14.16 If any replacement player plays in a match in contravention of Regulation 7.14 the Management Committee may impose on that player's Club a penalty in accordance with Regulation 24.4 and 24.5. 23.2.19    If any replacement player plays in a match in contravention of Playing Regulation 23.2 the Management Committee may impose on that player's Club a penalty in accordance with Playing Regulations 46 and 47.



ABM, 8-Jun-2020
Updated version 25-Jul-2020


Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.

maurice19cricket at gmail.com


Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE













20-07 Fielding Restrictions (Super 20)

PROPOSAL  Simplify the Fielding Restriction/Powerplay overs. Remove the 'Powerplay' 6 overs, leaving maximum 5 fielders outside the circle for all 20 overs.
Super 20 Reg 12 does not say what the penalty for this is. So add a rule about no ball.

REASONS We had an epiphany about following this set of rules during Season 2019/20. During the discussion it was suggested we should simplify the rules.

CURRENT REGULATIONS Super 20 Reg 12.2-12.6

POSSlBLE NEW REGULATION   See below



Arguments against
These rules are standard in Twenty 20 competitions everywhere. They are a part of the game that balances the bat and ball.

Arguments in favour
Equipment for marking circles is not regularly available, and sometimes it's forgotten in setup.

The simplification recommended is that fielding circles **will** apply in QSDCA Super 20 matches but *NOT* the Powerplay. This means "4 in the circle" for all 20 overs. Just 2 out for the first 6 overs is gone. This greatly simplifies the issue of adjusting the Powerplay when there are rain interruptions.


So to get the technical details here let's go to the ICC T20 Playing Conditions..... (With my edits showing)

From ICC Mens T20I Playing Conditions 2017 Code with Appendices  28 Sept 2017
https://www.cricketaustralia.com.au/cricket/-/media/46E13ADFA4BD4608B9D84D43096124C1.ashx

28.7 Restrictions on the placement of fieldsmen
28.7.1 In addition to the restrictions contained in clause 28.4 above, further fielding restrictions shall apply to certain overs in each innings. The nature of such fielding restrictions and the overs during which they shall apply are set out in the following paragraphs.
(28.4 lists max 2 behind square leg ad max total of 5 fielders on the legside.)

28.7.2 Subject to 28.7.6 below these additional fielding restrictions shall apply to the first 6 overs of each innings (Powerplay overs).

28.7.3 Two semi-circles shall be drawn on the field of play. The semi-circles shall have as their centre the middle stump at either end of the pitch. The radius of each of the semi-circles shall be 30 yards (27.43 metres). The semi-circles shall be linked by two parallel straight lines drawn on the field (see paragraph 2 of Appendix C). These fielding restriction areas should be marked by continuous painted white lines or ‘dots’ at 5 yard (4.57 metres) intervals, each ‘dot’ to be covered by a white plastic or rubber (but not metal) disc measuring 7 inches (18 cm) in diameter.
(This defines the fielding circles and the 'zone' the closer fielders must be within.)

28.7.4 During the Powerplay overs only two fieldsmen shall be permitted outside this fielding restriction area at the instant of delivery.
(We're not doing the Powerplay overs.)



28.7.5 During the non Powerplay overs, no more than 5 fieldsmen shall be permitted outside the fielding restriction area referred to in clause 28.7.3 above.
.. (Two rules referring to Powerplay conditions skipped here.)

28.7.8 In the event of an infringement of any of the above fielding restrictions, the square leg umpire shall call and signal ‘No Ball’.


A small but important issue is that the distance of the fielding circle is meant to be 30 yards (approx. 27.5 metres) from each set of stumps.



For a ICC ODI: page 71 shows this diagram.



EXISTING PLAYING REGULATION REVISED PLAYING REGULATION


12. FIELDING RESTRICTIONS
12.1 At the instant of delivery there will not be more than five fielders on the leg side. No change
12.2 For the first 6 overs only of each innings, only two fielders are permitted to be more than 30 metres from the facing batsman at the instant of delivery. 12.2 Nil
12.3 For the remaining overs of each innings, not more than five fielders are permitted to be more than 30 metres from the facing batsman at the instant of delivery. 12.3 The Fielding Restriction Area is defined as:
12.3.1 Two semi-circles with their centre at the middle stump at either end of the pitch.
12.3.2 The ends of the semi-circles will be linked by two parallel straight lines. drawn on the field. 

12.3.3 The radius of each of the semi-circles is 30 yards (27.43 metres).
12.3.4 The fielding restriction area should can be marked by continuous painted white lines or ‘dots’ at 5 yard (4.57 metres) suitable intervals, each ‘dot’ to be covered by a white plastic or rubber (but not metal) disc measuring 7 inches (18 cm) in diameter.
12.3.5 For the remaining overs of Throughout each innings, not more than five fielders are permitted outside the fielding restriction area to be more than 30 yards (27.5 metres) from the facing batsman  at the instant of delivery.
TEAM BATTING FIRST
12.4 In circumstances where the number of overs for the team batting first is reduced, the number of overs in regard to the restrictions in 12.2 above will be reduced proportionately in a ratio of 6:20 (30%) in accordance with the table below for that innings only. 12.4 Nil
12.5 Fractions are to be ignored in all calculations re the number of overs. (If on resumption the number of overs for fielding restrictions has already been exceeded this should take effect immediately).12.5 Nil
Total overs               20    17-19    14 - 16    10-13
Overs for which fielding
restrictions will apply   6           5             4            3
Nil
TEAM BATTING SECOND
12.6 Where the number of overs for the team batting second is reduced the aim will be to maintain the restrictions in 12.2 for the same proportion of the second innings that they were maintained for the first innings (fractions to be ignored). 12.6 Nil

12.7 In the event of an On infringement of any of the above fielding restrictions, the square leg either umpire shall will call and signal ‘No Ball’.

12.8 In addition to other fielding restrictions contained in Law 28 The Fielder.

The numbering can be rationalised. (i.e. leave out the 'Nils' and number in sequence.)

The reason for "not more than 5 fielders are permitted outside the fielding circle" instead of "minimum 4 inside the circle" is to allow 3 minimum inside the circle when the fielding side is short one player due to injury or similar reason.

Optionally the ICC Fielding Restriction diagram could be included at approx 12.4. 

In practice Subbies games will probably use dots, cones or markers of some kind. A pile of ice cream container lids would work or cutouts  made from coloured rubber sheeting with scissors). Conscientious grounds men might even mark out some white lines (but myself, I don't see the need to go that far... )

ABM 16-Feb-2020 
Revised 8-Jun-2020

Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.
 

maurice19cricket at gmail.com

Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE


20-08 5 Max. Fielders on Leg Side (Sunday 50 Comp.)

PROPOSAL Add a rule limiting leg side fielders to a maximum of 5.  

REASONS It brings the 50 over competition into line with One Day Internationals and Warehouse 50 over games. Some matches have been played using this rule in error in season 2019/20. This rule exists for the QSDCA Super 20 competition.  

CURRENT REGULATIONS None  

POSSlBLE NEW REGULATION
   12. FIELDING RESTRICTIONS 
   12.1 At the instant of delivery there will not be more than five fielders on the leg side.
   12.2 On infringement of the above fielding restrictions, either umpire will call and signal ‘No Ball’.


Arguments against
In 2017 this fielding restriction (along with powerplays and fielding circles) was left out of the competition for the sake of simplicity.

Arguments in favour
Many players (and some umpires) are used to this rule as they float between Warehouse in winter and Subbies in Summer.

Penalties
This could be made a differential no ball (i.e. a non-free hit no ball) but that is a complexity which can be avoided.


ABM, 16-Feb-2020


Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.
 

maurice19cricket at gmail.com

Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE



20-09 Revise Helmet Rules (Appendix K)

PROPOSAL Revise some quirks that have come up in the Playing Condition - Helmets. Cut the exemption for losing the helmet against slow bowling.

REASON Last year it was new and not perfect. There's some grammar issues in the wording. A suggestion to remove the slow bowling exemption for batsmen has been made due to the confusion felt by some people.

CURRENT REGULATIONS Appendix K PLAYING CONDITION – HELMETS

POSSIBLE REVISED REGULATIONS   See table below




The new mandatory helmet rules were introduced in 2019/20 for batsmen, close fielders and wicket-keepers. Generally the rules have met with acceptance from most players.

So far there I have heard two kinds of verbal feedback.

  • They're hot and restrict vision. I don't want to wear one when batting. ("Sorry, you are required to do so by the rules of this game.")
  • I forgot to bring/wear/make one out of a basket/(insert excuse here). ("Tough. Go get one. We'll wait but please hurry.")
I'm not going to address either of those issues here. The solutions to these are use soft balls or redesign the helmets so they're easier to wear. I can't make either of those changes by blogging about them here.


Helmet re-design is a MUST in my view. Visibility, ventilation for hot climates and sun safe rating are urgent issues in any country with hot weather. I'm surprised these issues aren't on the "cricket agenda" in Queensland. As with helmet compliance to the BS7928 standard, these issues must be addressed by players and clubs.

But it's off topic here.


Much less obvious problems include
  • Who's carrying the helmet when the slow bowler comes on? ("You could ask the Square Leg Umpire but I don't like your chances since he's already carrying three hats and a water bottle..." )
  • Also (usually from close in fielders) "I'm not standing closer than 7m from the bat". ("I think you are and I'm the umpire, not you.... helmet or take some steps back, please.")
  • An issue that came up precisely once (and for just for one over before stumps) was how to ensure an under 18yo wicket-keeper was keeping his 7m distance from the stumps when keeping without a helmet. Easy with two official umpires including a square leg umpire who can watch this.... But next to impossible with player square leg umpires (whose main response is "huh, what?")
  • One small suggestion received has been to remove the slow bowling exemption for batsmen. Many batsmen don't bother with this (and keep their helmet on).Then there's the complication of who carries the helmet(s) or the alternative hat(s) for the batsmen.

Anyway here's some revision ideas:  
Changes shown in red but additional changes in purple would need to be made if the slow bowling exemption was to be removed. All the purple changes are cuts.

EXISTING PLAYING REGULATIONREVISED PLAYING REGULATION
Appendix K PLAYING CONDITION – HELMETSno change
In all Association competitions and training sessions the following regulations will apply:no change
Batting   PC B(This change (in purple) would need to be made if the slow bowling exemption was to be removed.)
PC B1 A batter must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet at all times when batting against fast or medium-paced bowling.PC B1 A batter must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet at all times when batting against fast or medium-paced bowling.
PC B2 The umpire(s) are the sole judge of whether bowling is fast or medium-paced and will judge the pace of bowling against what is considered “fast”, “medium-paced” or “slow” within the context of that particular match.PC B2 The umpire(s) are the sole judge of whether bowling is fast or medium-paced and will judge the pace of bowling against what is considered “fast”, “medium-paced” or “slow” within the context of that particular match.
PC B2.1 The wicketkeeper standing either up to, or back from the stumps must not be the deciding factor in this decision.
PC B2.1 The wicketkeeper standing either up to, or back from the stumps must not be the deciding factor in this decision.
PC B3 The umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clause PC B1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the batter is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW
PC B4 The umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a batter fails to wear a helmet when required by this clause.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW



Wicketkeeping     PC Eno change
PC E1 At all times when wicket-keeping up to the stumps, the wicketkeeper must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet.PC E1 The wicket-keeper must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet at all times when wicket-keeping up to the stumps.
(rearranged to be more clear)
PC E2 The umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clause PC E1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the wicketkeeper is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW
PC E3 The umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a wicketkeeper fails to wear a British Standard 7928:2013 helmet when required by clause PC E1.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW


Junior Wicketkeepers Playing in Senior Competitions  PC Gno change
PC G1 Any wicketkeeper who is eligible to play junior cricket (under 18) at all times when wicket-keeping within 7 metres metres of the stumps , must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet.PC G1 Any wicketkeeper who is eligible to play junior cricket (under 18) must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet at all times when wicket-keeping within 7 metres metres of the stumps.  (rearranged to be more clear)
PC G2 The umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clause PC G1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the wicketkeeper is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW
PC G3 The umpire(s) are the sole judges of the distance from the stumps in this clause.no change
PC G4 The umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a wicketkeeper fails to wear a helmet when required by clause PC G1.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW


Fielding Inside arc from gully to leg gully    PC Lno change
PC L1 At all times when fielding in a position closer than 7 metres metres of the stumps from the batter’s position on the popping crease on a middle stump line, with the exception of any fielding position between the accepted position of off side gully to the accepted position of leg gully, must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet.PC L1 Any fielder must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 compliant helmet at all times when fielding in a position closer than 7 metres metres of the stumps from the batter’s position on the popping crease on a middle stump line, with the exception of any fielding position between the accepted position of off side gully to the accepted position of leg side gully. (rearranged to be more clear)
PC L2 The umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clause PCL1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the fielder is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW
PC L3 The umpire(s) are the sole judges of the distance from the stumps in this clause.no change
PC L4 The umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a fielder fails to wear a helmet when required by this clause PCL1.(Consolidated with other rules) SEE BELOW
PC L5 The exchange of protective equipment between members of the fielding side on the field of play is permitted provided that the umpire(s) do not consider that it constitutes a waste of playing time.no change
Note: For the avoidance of doubt, any fielder within the prescribed distance regarded to be fielding wider than a standard “gully” or “leg gully” must wear a British Standard 7928:2013 helmet. But fielders fielding finer than gully or leg gully e.g. any slip or leg slip are not required to wear a British Standard 7928:2013 helmet.no change


Responsibility and Enforcementno change
E1 The match umpires will be responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required but will not be responsible for ensuring that the helmet worn by any player is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013. E1 In a match with Association appointed umpires, the umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clauses PC B1, PC E1, PC G1 and PC L1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the batter, wicket-keeper or fielder is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.
E2 In a match with Association appointed umpires, the umpires will not allow the match to continue during any period in which any batter, wicket keeper standing up to the stumps or fielder within the prescribed area fails to wear a helmet.E2 In a match with Association appointed umpires, the umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a batter, wicket-keeper or fielder fails to wear a helmet when required by clauses PC B1, PC E1, PC G1 and PC L1.
E3 In a match without Association appointed umpires, the captains of both batting and bowling teams are responsible for compliance with these clauses.no change
E4 The captains of both batting and bowling teams will not permit the match to continue during any period in which any batter, wicket-keeper standing up to the stumps or fielder within the prescribed area fails to wear a helmet.E4 In a match without Association appointed umpires, the captains of both batting and bowling teams will not permit the match to continue during any period in which any batter, wicket-keeper standing up to the stumps or fielder within the prescribed area fails to wear a helmet.
E5 If any player plays in a match in contravention of clauses in Appendix K the Management Committee may impose on that player's Club a penalty in accordance with Regulation 24.4 and 24.5.no change


For the avoidance of doubtno change
K1 Caught: A batter can be out caught where the ball rebounds or ricochets directly or indirectly off the helmet worn by any player.no change
K2 Run Out: A batter can be out run out where the ball rebounds or ricochets directly or indirectly onto the stumps off the helmet worn by a fielder.no change
K3 Stumped: A batter can be out stumped where the ball rebounds or ricochets directly or indirectly onto the stumps off the helmet worn by a wicketkeeper.no change
K4 Replacement helmets: Helmets should be replaced immediately in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations following a significant impact.no change
K5 7 metre distance: Research shows that the minimum distance for a fielder to react to a batter hitting the ball is 7 metres.no change

The numbering can be rationalised. (i.e. leave out the 'Nils' and number in sequence.)

The other idea I have included is to combine some of the repetitious clauses.
  • Such as PC B3, PC E2, PC G2, PC L2.
    • E1 nearly replaces each of these...
    • E1 In a match with Association appointed umpires, the umpire(s) are responsible for ensuring that a helmet is worn when required by clauses PC B1, PC E1, PC G1 and PC L1 but are not responsible for ensuring that the helmet being worn by the batter, wicket-keeper or fielder is compliant with British Standard 7928:2013.
  • Also PC B4, PC E3, PC G4, PC L4
    • E2 nearly replaces each of these...
    • E2 In a match with Association appointed umpires, the umpire(s) must not allow the match to continue during any period in which a batter, wicket-keeper or fielder fails to wear a helmet when required by clauses PC B1, PC E1, PC G1 and PC L1.
 The enforcement conditions could be renumbered as something else to avoid confusion with PC E Wicketkeeping conditions.
 
ABM, 15-Feb-2020


Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.

maurice19cricket at gmail.com


Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE


20-04 Make Batsmen Wear Spiked Shoes (Reg 8)

PROPOSAL Add a rule requiring batsmen to wear spiked shoes while batting.

REASON Bowlers have to. Groundskeepers advise that rubber soled shoes 'burn' the grass and damage the pitch.

CURRENT REGULATIONS None

POSSIBLE NEW REGULATION
8.1.5 Players must wear cricket shoes with full metal spikes while batting.
8.1.5.1 Spike length will be limited to 9mm.
8.1.5.2 Any bowler with shoes that do not comply with regulation 8.1.5 will not be allowed to bat.


Arguments against

The biggest argument against this is the extra costs for some players.

Kookaburra Pro 2000 Metal Spike (Senior) is on special for $85 at KD Sports today.
(No good if you want size 9/9.5 !!! They have not got that size in stock probably because it's near the end of the season, I guess.)

Next argument is the organisation and preparation needed .Players must go to a specialist retailer and get some spiked shoes, or work out a scheme to swap with team mates (find the team mate with shoes that fit and avoids clashes in the batting order).
Last time I did this my spikes were split open by some guy with size 12 feet. He didn't offer to get 'em fixed or replaced either. I had to buy me a new pair.

Both these problems are a *BARRIER* to participation for fill-in and occasional players.

Most teams in Subbies Cricket are going to rely on fill-ins at some point in the season. So this is important.

Also participation requires whites, helmets, bats gloves and pads, membership and playing fees (at some level but not necessarily the entry level.) so it's barriers all the way... what's so different about this one?

On the other hand it might encourage commitment. Fill-ins are more likely to become frequent or regular players... if they have the gear now.


Arguments in favour

The extra grip offered to players on the wicket block means less skidding and 'burns' on the grass. I would love to present some actual data or observations of this. (I think the evidence is anecdotal.)

Also in damp conditions the risk of slipping leading to injury or dismissal would be reduced by using spikes.

This website (http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/rules_and_equipment/4177392.stm) helpfully suggests the following.
  • You can choose your shoe depending on the type of surface you play on.
  • Spiked shoes are good for playing on soft ground, while pimpled rubber soles are better for hard ground.
  • You can also get a combination of both spikes and pimples.
  • Batters usually prefer shoes with spikes at the front for grip and rubber-treaded heels.
  • Fast bowlers usually have shoes with spikes at the front and back with extra support around the ankle.
Some of that is arguable for various other reasons but it suggests that this is far from a simple debate.

It is up to those who want this to persuade the rest of us. Will it lead to less slipping over? Will pitch maintenance costs be reduced? Will casual players still get in the game?

A sensible argument in favour is needed or else this won't change.


Alternative approaches to the new regulation
A suggestion already made about this idea is to write a new rule in terms of 'access to the wicket block'. Presumably the purpose of this is to 'catch all feet on the pitch' with a single regulation. This may have implications for umpires, ground staff and close fielders who will all have an argument for an exemption. That might lead to a weak rule or one that is difficult to administer.

Penalties

A more important thing to consider adding is something about enforcement penalties. This could apply to all clothing breaches including spikes, hats, white shirts.

There are two parts involved.
  1. A rule requiring reporting of clothing breaches
  2. Another rule that sets out fines or actions to deter breaches.
In my opinion it should not be left to umpires alone to report this. Detecting and preventing it is hard enough. How would clothing be enforced at non-umpired matches? What if opposition captains were asked to report? What if bonus points were held back for teams with repeated breaches?

That is a bit extreme....I'm shocked I even typed it. That is open to abuses isn't it?
  • Zealous captains keen for a tactical advantage will report everything. 
  • Lazy captains won't report anything and hope that the favour is returned by their opposition (and complain when it isn't.). 

It will not get much support I predict. but it's a different approach to the non-system we have now.

For bowlers this has partly been resolved by adding Reg 8.17 which explicitly empowers umpires to stop bowlers who do not wear spiked shoes.

This needs a better suggestion.
What about...
  • bonus points for compliance
  • cash prizes/trophies for best dressed team
  • vouchers for Rebel Sport for those who players who deserve/need it. 
I said *better* ideas......
This stuff is unlikely to be popular. I don't think this will get much support.
But unless there is something in place then rules will only be followed by those who already 'care'.

ABM, 15-Feb-2020
Revised 8-Jun-2020
See the discussion about White Cricket shoes  LINK

Here's an article on selecting cricket shoes https://cricketyorkshire.com/cricket-shoes/


Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.

maurice19cricket at gmail.com


Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE



20-03 White Cricket Shoes (Reg 8.1.5)

PROPOSAL Remove requirement for **white** cricket shoes (Reg 8.1.5)

REASON You can't buy white shoes anymore, and the rule is unenforceable!

CURRENT REGULATIONS Playing Regulation 8 describes clothing requirements for players in Subbies cricket. 8.1.5 says ***White*** cricket shoes




This is what cricket boots used to be like.


These are not 'new'. They date from the 1940's.

I found 'em on eBay being sold as some kind of "antique" clothing .
  • Canvas sides.
  • Soft leather inner.
  • Hard leather (slippery) sole.
To prepare for each day's play you'd have to 'white' these with "painty stuff" (and you'd be doing your batting pads too).

It smelled funny and took ages to dry.

The problem is one that has been coming for a while.

This is a sample of what you can get today at KD Sports.... (click on the pics for prices and ordering)


https://kdsport.com.au/cricket-shoes-spikes-brisbane-australia/gray-nicolls-en-2-3-4-5/gn-pro-1000-metal-spikes.html https://kdsport.com.au/cricket-shoes-spikes-brisbane-australia/kookaburra-en-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9/kookaburra-pro-2000-metal-spike-senior.html
https://kdsport.com.au/cricket-shoes-spikes-brisbane-australia/new-balance-en-2-3-4/new-balance-ck4040-n3-cricket-shoes.html
https://kdsport.com.au/cricket-shoes-spikes-brisbane-australia/asics/asics-gel-300-no-cricket-shoes-en-2.html



More comfortable, low maintenance, better performance... no blisters wearing these in.

But coloured soles, fluoro stripes, cartoon kookaburras



No umpire reports about non-white shoes have been made... ever? Well certainly not recently. . The Management Committee has not considered any penalty for non-white shoes... ever? Well certainly not recently. .

We all want the game to look "like cricket" but reality has to be acknowledged.

If there's a practical way to have all white cricket shoes in suburban Brisbane cricket in the 2020's then let's hear it now....

See the other move proposed for shoes about spikes..... LINK



ABM, 14-Feb-2020



Comments below please. (Subject to moderation.)

Click on this link for a guide on how to post a comment. https://tinyurl.com/kmkvpub

Link printed so it can be copied off paper printouts.

If you can't comment perhaps it would be easier to send me an email.

maurice19cricket at gmail.com


Email address has been 'munged' to prevent spamming.

To use it copy and paste into email app and replace the " at " with a "@"


Link to Top of this page CLICK HERE
 
Back to introduction CLICK HERE